Well, then, lets see, ..., oh, ah, no that wont work, ..., nah that wont work e-ver, ..., kinnel this aint easy, harder than getting to th group page on the phone in fact, ..., hang on, this aint my problem anyways, i'm not at my 'fans' beck and call, ..., they can write their own effing tag lines, ..., besides which tip is all an horrendous case of the 'Larry O's' anyway innit, ..., but one should, perhaps, be graceful and show some decorum and posh even pity for the poor denizens of the fabled lost cities, afterall its not their fault that Texas is so dull that I become of, (even (especially?) fake), interest, ..., they'll have to make do with this '[ s]something worthwhile[ /s] summat MEANWHILE', ..., if 'they' have to alter code to fit in the strike-thru tags then so much the better. ..., that'll learn them, innit, etc
So, 'non-partial' is it then?, ..., I'm fairly partial to the fullest use of 'expanded' language myself, & so this got me finking n'that, ..., as far as the debates about cars favoured here by the collective I'd use the term 'apartial' to describe my own stance.
p.s. I am disappointed at bb code tags aren't allowed in visitor messages, I find it limits my scope of expression n'that.
p.p.s. Whilst here I checked out yer burb on google's street view, it placed me looking at the city hall, 'very nice' I thought. I then turned around, ..., what a dump!, ..., & I live in not just the UK, but in the West Midlands, ..., you poor so-&-so, ..., still at least its not Mesquite etc